Search results

I tested on Chrome 71 on a desktop that does not have an webcam or microphone connected. I tested on the https://demo.flashphoner.com: 1) I started a stream on the Streamer example 2) I verified on the Player example on another web browser tab on the same laptop that the streaming works 3)...

The player does play the streaming video when there is no media device on the computer.

I am not sure what the latest fixes are about but the current status is: Application Window and Chrome Tab do not work for screen sharing.

I have tried to screen share using the example here: https://demo.flashphoner.com/ from computer that does not have microphone or webcam and here is the error I got:

Is there any update with this? We are still unable to screen share the Application Window on the latest Chrome.

Application Window and Chrome Tab screen sharing does not work on Chrome 71.0.3578.98, I tested here: https://demo.flashphoner.com/ Only the Entire Screen works.

So, in the case that you have only a couple of streams that need transcoding it would be better to have a few but powerful cores (i7) versus more and weaker (Xeon). Is that right?

Can you tell whether Flashphoner performs better on a Xeon or i7? Does, for example, the transcoding performs faster or one or the other CPU?

After doing an upgrade to the newest version the rest app methods for a specific app were lost. I had to add them all again.

Would you recommend to create 5 mixers for each presenter that will exclude the presenter who will playback it? What is the CPU impact for generating a mixer?

We are trying to implement the following scenario: 1 presenter initiates a sceenshare + audio 4 other presenters join with audio only several other people watch the single screenshare and listen to the 5 presenters The obvious idea is to create a mixer and join all 5 streams to 1 and let the...

The problem is now gone.

The latest Chrome version provides a sound option with the screen share. How does that affect broadcasting? Should we explicitly attach audio on the CreateStream or leave it to Chrome to take care of it?

On the other hand, the Media Devices example works fine, it was displaying "Failed to get media devices" error message previously. Maybe I am testing wrongly because the Streamer example might require a webcam to be present in order to stream, thus it fails.

Sorry, I copied pasted the versions from a wrong demo server by mistake. I tested with the latest version and the problem still persists. We test on a laptop which has a key that disables the webcam, on hardware level I suppose.

This is not a server side issue. It is a problem with the flashphoner.js library as far as I understand. And in any case, I have tested again with 0.5.28.2747 - 5.1.3539 and the same problem persists.

Is it possible to add authentication?

I am trying to connect with the VisualVM to a remote WCS server but it fails. Is it because there is no authentication by default and it only accepts connections from localhost? How do I make it accept authenticated JMX connections?

The flashphoner js library fails to detect the microphone where the computer does not have a video device. Here are the test results: I run the test.webrtc.org Then I run the streamer example and when I click on the Start Chrome 69 reports "Requested device not found" But, when I run the...

I was on https 8888 with Comodo SSL. I tested it on Chrome 69 on Windows, not Mac. We had several reports from various clients. The one who gave me remote access to test was with Windows. So, it is not related with Mac only.